Assessing The Scope And Diversity Of Hilton Hotels Tourism Essay

Assessing The Scope And Diversity Of Hilton Hotels Tourism Essay There are 1.7 million employees engaged in the hospitality industry in the UK, which is almost 6 of the total working class people. Yearly turnover is  £55- £60b from the hospitality industry, includes all sizes or types of hospitality businesses or organisations. It is so difficult to say that which is the biggest organisation, as it is depends on so many factors. There are some top operators in the market specialised in own sectors. Generally, they are based on their yearly turnover, sizes, types, number of employees, sectors, sub-sectors etc. According to VisitBritain, 27.7m overseas visitors came to the UK in 2004. There is a 13 increase in terms of like for like sales than the previous year. Visitors have spent an estimated value of  £13b in the year 2004 increasing 10 than 2003, according to VisitBritain. On the other hand, domestic tourists spent 70.5 million on holidays of more than one night within the UK. Domestic business trips were also made, estimated more than 22 million, in 2003. An estimated total domestic spend was  £59 billion. In the case of tourism, there are an estimated 1.4 million jobs in the UK, which is 5 of all working people. Scope: There are 14 industries included in the hospitality sector; from hotels and restaurants through to events, gambling, pubs, and food contracts, school meals, catering for parties, conferences, Night clubs and travel services. Diversity: There are many types of Hospitality services available in the market, such as Luxury hotels (5*-7*), Boutique hotel, Mid range hotel, Budget hotel, guest house/B their reliable group of hotel brands includes the Waldorf Astoria, Conrad Hilton Hotels & Resorts, Doubletree, Embassy Suites, Hilton Garden Inn, Hampton Inn & Suites, Homewood Suites by Hilton, Home2 Suites by Hilton and Hilton Grand Vacations (About us: Hilton Worldwide, 2010). Hilton’s commitment to creating extraordinary guest experiences remains unaffected and their more than 130,000 team member s continue to introduce the quality of service to the UK and the world’s visitors for 90 years of operations (About us: Hilton Worldwide, 2010). The organisational structure of various hospitality businesses Large full-service hotel: A well-run large full-service lodging facility, this requires the following department heads:

Organizational Analysis Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3750 words

Organizational Analysis - Essay Example One could not simply analyze Starbucks Indiana Commons as disconnected from the entire organization since it sourced all policies, regulations, and standards from one main source. B. Type of organization: Starbucks Corporation is a non-educational organization that offers specialty coffee through strategically located branches all over the world. Its standard industry classification code is 5812 which is defined as â€Å"eating places (which includes) establishments primarily engaged in the retail sale of prepared food and drinks for on-premise or immediate consumption. Caterers and industrial and institutional food service establishments are also included in this industry† (Marigold Technologies, n.d., p. 1). It is therefore also classified as a global business concern that caters to different people around the world. According to the information disclosed in nyjobsource.com (2012), the total number of Starbucks stores as of April 2012 is â€Å"17,420 locations worldwide wit h 12,570 in the Americas† (par. 1). C. Classification according to Blau and Scott From Blau and Scott’s types of organizations, it could be deduced that Starbucks is classified as a business concern where external customers are served from offering specialty coffee and other food products in various strategic locations. D. Funding source(s) In a report published online by Obi (2009), it was explicitly disclosed that â€Å"Starbucks’ primary source of financing comes from proceeds from issuance of commercial papers† (Obi, 2009). From a review of its financial statements, it was specifically indicated that operating activities provide funds sources amounting to as much as â€Å"$1.6 billion for fiscal year 2011† (Starbucks Corporate, 2012, p. 36). The noted operating activities specifically mean selling coffee and other products offered in Starbucks store outlets. E. Brief history of the organization including major changes and developments The first Starbucks store was reportedly opened in 1971 at Seattle’s Pike Place Market (Starbucks Corporation, 2012). Having been in operations for 41 years now, Starbucks has grown into a global organization with 54 coffee blends. Aside from coffee, other drink options include Frappuccino, chocolate beverages, smoothies, Tazo teas, and Refreshers (Starbucks, 2012). Likewise, there are an array of food products such as sandwiches, pastries, breakfast offerings, yogurt, ice cream and petite treats. The opening of other store locations within the United States had been unprecedented since marking 17 new stores in 1987 to 1,412 ten years after that. To date, specifically as of July 1, 2012, its official website revealed a total of 17,651 stores has been established and is currently operational globally. For Indiana Commons, this particular store outlet was opened five or six years ago, as revealed by Liz, the Shift Supervisor that one successfully interviewed. Thereby, when compared to th e entire organization, the Starbucks Indiana Commons is relatively new. It is likewise noteworthy that Starbucks has grown, not only in terms of offering more coffee varieties and food products or in the number of stores opened around the world; but more so, in the number of rewards garnered through the years. The following rewards have been recently acknowledged and received, as shown in Table 1: Table 1: Recent Rewards, Starbucks Corporation Reward Awarded By Year â€Å"

Eisenhower Comparison Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Eisenhower Comparison - Essay Example Greenstein who, in his article â€Å"A Look at the Evidence† characterized Eisenhower as an astute politician who was actively involved in shaping public policies and carefully considered all aspects of an issue before making a decision. Greenstein faults the false perception of Eisenhower to his inconspicuous, low-key leadership approach which served him well in managing the victory in WWII and was also effective during his two terms as President. As might be expected, there is little to compare in these two articles, each presenting opposing views regarding the effectiveness of this particular former President. Brand’s article characterizes Eisenhower based primarily upon his effectiveness as a leader in developing a National Security policy, an on-going practice throughout his term of office that provided few acceptable conclusions. This analysis is based primarily upon outside evidence as seen in the actual events that unfolded rather than through any kind of inside evidence that details the president’s actual involvement in the discussions that were held. For example, much of the article focuses upon the actions of Congress and of specialized committees that were convened to discuss the various issues involved in nuclear armament.